Irishwonder’s Black Hat SEO Blog A blog about blackhat, general SEO issues and other things related to the life on the web

Overall, I have nothing against GoDaddy. It’s a convenient registrar with handy domain search finctions, bulk registration and almost everything else a black hat could dream of. Sure its site’s a bit bloated and takes forever to load - but other than that, generally I’ve been pretty happy with them.

If not for one thing - auto-renewals. Sure thing, if you have a ton of domains you intend to keep it’s nice not to have to worry about renewing them - but what if you want to drop some of your domains? Seems like by default, they now add auto-renewal to all the domains you buy with them. I wasn’t really aware of this until recently I decided not to renew a bunch of domains. I renewed the ones I wanted, just left without attention all the rest and left it at that. All of a sudden, on the expiration date I receive a message from GoDaddy that my card has been charged the cost of all those domains renewed for a year! If it was one or two domains I probably wouldn’t have cared much and just said ok, but there was a bunch of them and quite a lump sum of money - so I contacted their support and told them I didn’t want those domains and asked for a refund.

I must say that despite the fact that GoDaddy has no live chat with their support, they are pretty fast answering any email inquiries they get. They replied explaining what I should do and how to remove the auto- renewal option off my domains if I do not want them auto-renewed in the future. Since the procedure is slightly less than obvious here are the instructions for those of you who have domains at GoDaddy:

- Log into your account and click the “My Renewals and Upgrades” item in the side menu

- Select “Payments and Renewing Items” in the submenu

- You will see a list of all your domains with indications whether the auto-renewal for each of them is “On” or “Off” in the “Auto” column of the list

- Select the checkboxes for the domains you want to cancel the auto-renewal for and click the “Auto Renew” button at the top of the list (what sucks, tho, is that if you have more than 20 domains you will have to do it for as many times as there are pages of the list of your domains, with 20 domains per page only)

- You will see a form on the right of your page offering different options for renewals - select what you need, click Save and you’re done.

If anybody finds a way to do it in bulk please let me know - I haven’t found any options for bulk domain management.

I’ve had a lot of fun recently reading this post by Michael Gray a.k.a. Graywolf - to be honest I always enjoy his rants, whatever they are about. Whatever it is he’s writing about, you know he really means it and some stuff he comes up with is totally hilarious.

Anyways back to Digg. If you’ve been living under a rock, I’ll have you know that it has killed off all external links recently and when you click the link from the submitted post to a site you get taken to a framed page that has the infamous Digg toolbar on top and the target site’s content below it. In the code of the page it looks like this:

<iframe id="diggiFrame" name="diggiFrame" noresize="noresize"
 src="http://www.your-target-site.com" frameborder="0"></iframe>

Well so, that’s your XSS done backwards - pretty much. Not you hacking into an authority site but the authority site hijacking your content. Michael goes on to suggest it can be still used as parasite hosting - but TBH, I’ve yet to see a single one of those Digg short url pages indexed or better yet ranking in Google. The submission pages at Digg do get indexed as well as ever before - but the short URLs are kinda hmm… I have checked the submission page code to see what causes it and found this:

<a href="http://www.your-target-site.com" class="offsite
ct-lifestyle" rel="dc:source,[your short URL]" property="dc:title" 
target="_blank" onclick="gotoLink('12021587');">Your Submission
Title</a>

The link to the actual submitted site page is cloaked - only hoomins get there but not the Googlebot. Of course this effectively prevents Google from indexing the short URL - without Digg being too explicit about it, like stating it in its (terribly formatted) robots file or inserting stupid nofollows nobody really cares about etc.

But Graywolf, being Graywolf, as skilled as he is in all the darker-than-white arts and exploits, couldn’t have failed to notice this bit. I see people accusing him of shite in that post’s comments - but I believe he has a reason to post what he has posted. I do honestly thing Michael has a plot to get Digg banned - and here’s the bit that proves it, his list of steps to follow to “abuse” it:

• Set yourself up with a nice spammy lander page and submit it to digg, like this (http://digg.com/d1kRNK)
• It doesn’t matter if it get voted, up, down, sideways, or even gets buried
• Go get yourself some links, beg, borrow, steal, do whatever it takes
• Buy links, lots of links, quality is irrelevant, you want massive quantities (you do know that paid crappy links work differently when pointed at trusted sites right?).
• Sit back and wait for rankings to come, and collect your affiliate checks

(The italicising is mine to draw your attention to these points.)

A site linking to spammy pages / bad neighborhood? A site with purchased links, especially such that look like they have a “stab me I’m a paid link” sign on their back? All of the above done en masse? If this does not look like a recipe to get Digg banned by Google then I don’t know what does. (Sorry Michael if you intended to keep this secret plot secret, it was just too hilarious for me not to post about it).

But we also know that Graywolf is known for critisizing Google, right? I don’t know any questionable innovation from Google that he has not posted about and exposed its evil nature. So, I also believe that he is feeding Google its own poison: you like authority sites? you don’t like paid links? Eat your own sh#t then!

Hilarious beyond measure.

OK not explaining here in detail why you would want to do it - those smart enough will know themselves and the rest prolly don’t even need it.

There is a way to share the posts / updates of feeds you are subscribed to in Google reader without actually aving to click “Share” on each item you wnat to share. By default, your Shared items in Google reader are public - either open to everyone or just your friends, depeding on how you set it up. But to place an item into your shared items feed, you need to mrk it as shared manually. Now, what if you want a whole certain feed public by default?

First, you need to create a folder for the feeds you want shared. Then, go to your Google Reader settings, select the “Folders and Tags” tab, select you special folder and in the “Change sharing” dropdown select “Public”. That’s it, you’re done!

Now, use it wisely - don’t kill it for everyone.

Wikipedia results in otherwise commercial SERPs have become so commonplace that they cannot surprise anybody anymore. Infact the exchanges like, “Where does your site rank?” - “At #2 but the first one is Wikipedia so not much luck getting any higher” - have become quite typical as well. But somehow, I sense this is not the worst…

Google has been playing with YouTube. First they let you add transcripts to your videos and translate them - and now this. So, is the next step Google indexing these bits and pieces linked *technically* to distinctively different URLs and rank them for all kinds of queries? Hmm hmm hmm…

Folks, I must confess of something. I, too, have gone that way and released an ebook. Now my name can be slandered along with the names of all the ebook writing gurus. My only excuse is my ebook does not contain any bullshit like most gurus’.

I know many of my readers have whitehat projects so this ebook will be handy for promoting them nicely. (Time for my favorite 3-year-old SugarRae quote about blackhats whitehatting their ass off!) No need to think linkbuilding through directory submissions is the thing of the past - you just need to know a few tricks and it still works, even better than ever. The ebook comes with a nice list of bonuses, including a 4,000-strong directory list which actually contains live directories and the pagerank of those directories is current, for a change.  Moreover, I will keep updating it at least after every pagerank update. Another bonus those getting the ebook will be receiving very soon is a desktop tool for automating some of the keyword competitiveness research tasks that I am building right now - all for free.

Now head over to the Directory Marketing Reborn ebook site and see for yourself what it’s all about. Fantomaster has already recommended it.

Continuing the series of my blackhat tool reviews, here is the review of Immortal Promoter released last year by Vsloathe who is an old member of syndk8.

Immortal Promoter is a tool for automated link building. It may sound like just another script for linkspamming out there but it’s not. Infact, all you need to do for it to work is insert a bit of code into your pages and sit back. IP runs on its own server so you don’t have to install anything. It works off the traffic that your site gets (naturally or with a bit of your help - whichever way you wish). It creates not only one particular type of links like so many scripts out there, but a whole variety of them. It finds the source sites for these links itself, takes your keywords and your page URLs and creates links for you. It even has a special module of code you can use with your WordPress blogs or your generated sites - and it will get the keywords or post titles and use them as your anchor texts. It can even use the traffic of one of your sites to promote your other site. Does it ever get any handier?

It may sound like something that is too good to be true but behind this tool is the expertise and many hours of research by Vsloathe and his guys - and this guy definitely knows what he’s talking about.

To demonstrate you what it’s all about, here is the result I got after running a quick test of Immortal Promoter. I started with a brand new site based on WP (my URL is obscured, sorry, as it’s a real site I still intend to use, but you will still get the picture) and here’s what I had at the beginning (September 2008):

No links since nothing has ever been done with this site before I started my experiment. I had no real traffic to the site either. So I ran a script loading random pages on my site and refreshing them every few seconds for a few weeks, on and off, as you can see from these traffic stats:

I didn’t run it much - anywhere from 500 to 1,000 pageloads a day mostly. It wasn’t even every day. But even with this setup, I still got some results:

But to make matters even more complicated, I didn’t make this screenshot right afterusing IP actively - I took it almost half a year later, yesterday! So, as you can see, not only have I acquired 128 links but these links have survived for a prolonged period of time.

So this, in my opinion, is one of the main differences: Immortal Promoter provides you with links that do not get deleted right afetr you spam them around - they survive and benefit you long term as well. Among other pleasant features of the tool is a forum for its users where the developer has posted a number of how-tos for different setups and platforms. In that forum, the users can also report all the bugs they can find when using IP as well as request additional features - e.g. I know that both YACG hook and WP hook have been developed at the request of the tool users. Vsloathe, being in your shoes, understands your needs and is being really proactive in answering them. All of the above makes Immortal Promoter a worthy investment.

Those who have been waiting for purely blackhat posts from me, brace yourselves cause this is as blackhat as it gets.

I was checking the “buy viagra” SERPs in Google today and came across something that entertained me a lot. Who did I see ranking at #1 for “buy Viagra” but… Michael Martinez!

Why would a well respected member of the SEO community, known to be as whitehat as they get want to spam his forum profile to the top of buy viagra SERPs? Something smelt fishy here and I decided to dig deeper. Heres’ what I’ve seen when I clicked through to see the actual page:

Upon further examination, it became clear that the well respected member of the SEO community has nothing to do with this profile and some spammer just used his name randomly (or not so randomly?). But what totally amazed me is how fast this profile reached the goal of its creation:

As you see, it’s been created only9 days ago - and already succeeded in making it to the top of such competitive SERPs!

Little wonder here, really. OpenX is a free, open source ad server that manages the selling and delivery of online advertising inventory. It is also a 2001 authority domain with over 6 million links as reported by Yahoo. The profile page itself has 485 links that Yahoo already knows of. Using the power of an authority domain at it best!

While the spammer made a great choice of his parasite hosting resource, he has, however, made one mistake. If not for such a renown name he chose to use, his trick would have probably gone unnoticed.

This blog gets a lot of traffic from people searching for blackhat and general SEO tools and software so I thought I’d continue my series of tool reviews. Today, we’ll look at a tool called BruteForce SEO, all the hype around it and what’s behind this hype.

Strictly speaking, BFSEO is not really a blackhat tool - and has never been positioned as such by its owner, a certain Australian named Peter Drew who has previously enjoyed some tool related fame connected with his previous release, Bad Ass RSS (infact, when you search for him in Google, you get nothing but his own blogs, search pages etc. - which can only mean one of the two things, namely that either nobody is talking of him or he does a really good job at reputation management - or possibly even both).

But however Pete’s skills at online marketing himself and his releases may rock, the tool itself, BFSEO, is a failure at large. First announced and prelaunched  in September 2008, this tool boasted a nifty set of features that were either supposed to come with it right away or be delivered soon after - e.g. an automated solution for social bookmarking submissions - only to be failed or released much later, this all with a monthly subscription fee. That very social bookmarking automation module only came out with the February update, so you would have had to pay the monthly fee for half a year to get what’s been announced as the functionality to arrive next week after the launch. The tool itself came out buggy, many early subscribers complained they couldn’t install the updates, or the tool stopped working after installing the updates. The software’s windows do not fit smaller resolution screens, some buttons end up below the fold with no way to access them, the tool crashes often in the middle of something… - the list goes on and on.

A typical screen a BFSEO user is likely to see :

Technically, BFSEO is a Windows-only desktop application built on .Net and running in a browser (IE, of course) instance. Consequently, there is little to no way to integrate it with your server based tools.

From the point of view of its functionality, BFSEO is a ripoff of SENuke for those who are familiar with it, with a little twist. It starts with a screen where the user should enter the details of the project - such as keywords, the URL of the site to be promoted, existing accounts in Google, Yahoo, Tripod, etc. or as an option create those accounts. It took the developer a while to figure out the places such as WordPress.com actually send email confirmations with a link to be clicked before anything is activated there - and for the audience the tool is mareketed for (beginners wanting to make some money on the web and not knowing much about it) this is of course far from the obvious. The tool has often been struggling with captchas in its different versions - and truth be told, it does not solve captchas but serves them up to the user for the user to solve them manually.

The next step is adding the articles/content - here we meet the next bunch of problems, such as lack of support for UTF encodings and consequently, inability of the tool to work adequately with any languages other than English. In the later versions, Pete added a twist claiming to generate “unique” content out of any material given to the tool - but the same content with a different set of HTML tags inserted into it hardly qualifies for being unique. Also, at different stages users have complained about their content disappearing should they want to save the project for later use and quit in the middle of it - which is kinda a desirable bit of functionality, considering that the complete run of the tool takes about 4 hours with the user having to provide input every now and then.

OK so, after you’re done struggling with adding your content the tool starts creating your pages in Yahoo! Geocities (that is, provided it hasn’t failed to create you an account there), Google Pages (never seen this one succeed in half a year), Tripod (50% success rate), Wordpress.com, Blogger.com and submitting your article to a bunch of article sites. (The accounts for those article sites are created by a separate module that is not connected to the tool in any way and does not support automated exporting of created accounts into BFSEO, so you have to enter them manually). After this step is done, the feeds from all the places that have them are submitted into feed directory sites, for some of them again you had to create the accounts beforehand with a different tool and no export option. After all of that is done, theoretically you can also bookmark all the stuff that’s just been created in social bookmarking sites - again same story with their accounts.

Mind you, from the point you start the tool running creatoing the pages and up to the point it is done submitting bookmarks there is no way to stop or pause the tool or skip any of the steps - you are bound to sit and watch it run slowly without any real progress indication you could trust and enter captchas manually every now and then. hence, definitely not a blackhat tool. I cannot really imagine a blackhat having so much time on his hands as to sit and watch his sites’ pagerank grow like this.

Truth be told, the results of such a run are quite effective, and the sites run through BFSEO get indexed pretty fast, and the mini network, should it get created successfully and not dropped or hung up somewhere in the middle, is quite powerful due to kinda smart interlinking done in the process - but should the run fail anywhere there is no way to intelligently redo it or fix what has failed or pick up where it dropped, or even get the info of what has been craeted already, thus turning it into waste.

What is even more disappointing is Pete’s attitude towards his users - he kinda had a system in place to listen to all their complaints and bug reports, with multiple channels to do so - from built in functionality in the early versions of BFSEO (which he later killed off) up to having a forum for his tool users - but he tends to ignore most of the feedback and suggestions anyway. His developer (not even sure it is the same developer still, seeing how the tool was completely overhauled at some point) contected at least some of the users soon after launch - but even the feedback on bugs provided to the developer (Pete himself is no coder and maybe it explains it) did not help as we haven’t seen the bugs we mentioned fixed up to the version we’ve seen last before we unsubscribed.

Why have I subscribed to it in the first place? The hype around the launch was pretty big, the marketing campaign was quite an interesting one, with a countdown till launch page, pre-release signups, limited number of spots available at every stage etc., plus as some of you may know I am into building my own tools lately so I kinda wanted to see how others handle it. Besides, since one of the goals of this blog is to review the tools currently available in the market, and Pete himself has not offered me to review his tool like some developers do, I needed to know what it’s all about to then be able to answer people’s questions adequately.

Was it worth the money spent for me personally? Yes absolutely - I now know what mistakes to avoid and how not to kill an effective marketing campaign by releasing a failsome tool. Would it be worth it for you? I doubt so, unless you are a newbie wanting a quick start and even ready to tolerate the bugs for that purpose - but as soon as you learn about the mini-networks, authority sites, interlinking and what works best, unsubscribe. No matter what new features he promises. It might take him another half a year to release them.

Those of you following me on FriendFeed already know that I’ve been rehosting this blog - which has now been completed successfully, with much less hassle than the irishwonder.com one. While at it, I had Earl Grey email me some of the old files from the previous server and when I opened the email in Gmail here’s what I have noticed:

There wasn’t a single word in the email referring to blackhat SEO or anything of the sort - there was, as you can see, only the mention of Syndk8 and me - and yet it was enough for Google to target this ad at me. I obscured the actual site URL not to provide any free advertising to yet another clueless newb wanting to cash in on an ever-so-popular (up to the point of becoming painfully mainstream) concept of Black Hat SEO.

What proves my point even more is the fact that it’s not the first or one of a few sites trying to cash in on blackhat I’ve seen lately. The other day, I came across a newly started forum of another clueless newb - again, claiming to be a useful source of information about blackhat seo - yea well, maybe in a few years, dude, so far the forum was pretty empty. That one, though, had quite a creative way of promoting himself - he was distributing torrents of popular BH software with its title modified to include his site’s URL - if only the software owner doesn’t catch him at some point and kick his arse he might even be able to create himself a small following of equally clueless newbs - blackhat wannabes.

As I watch it all I am not worried about “competition” or disappointed or anything - first of all this is no competition to seasoned blackhats who do more than they talk. Gaming Google has become so much more difficult that it actually requires skills, experience and a good deal of creativity these days - not just stealing somebody else’s tools and running off with them. These wannabes give blackhat SEOs a bad name - well guess what, our reputation has never been really fluffy so who cares. I am only slightly nostalgic about the days when Syndk8 was the only blackhat SEO forum, we were the only blackhats, all mainstream forums used to kick us out so we had to start our own place to talk about BH and share our ideas - since we had a lot to share. Do these mainstream wannabes have anything worthy to share? Somehow, I doubt…

But those of you just starting and not knowing any better - watch out, they are in it for your money. Well, I guess everybody does what they can to make their dollar or two - but use your best judgement and check around what everybody is saying about them before getting out your credit card.

Came across this web2.0 toy for graphical/verbal representation of any site, blog feed, delicious tags of a user etc. - ran this blog through it and here’s what came out of it:

title="Wordle: Irishwonder.syndk8.co.uk"> src="http://www.wordle.net/thumb/wrdl/374002/Irishwonder.syndk8.co.uk"
style="padding:4px;border:1px solid #ddd">